跳转到主要内容

每个人都谈5G的好处,有人关注它对人体健康的危害吗?

5G service is coming, so are health concerns over the network
来源: Bob Mok



在过去的一年中,第五代无线通讯技术(5G)成为美中贸易谈判的热门话题。许多人为此写文章,指出该技术的优势及其国家安全问题。但与5G技术相关的健康危害几乎无人关注,且被主流媒体忽视。

Over the past year, the fifth generation (5G) wireless technology becomes a hot topic as part of the US-China trade talks. Many articles are written, identifying the advantages offered by the technology along with its security issues. The health hazards associated with 5G technology are almost never put into focus and reported by main-stream media.


 
为了搞懂实施5G技术带来的健康风险,我们首先要了解这一无线技术是如何工作的。从第一代无线技术开始,人类,动物和环境多年来就面临了健康风险。我们暴露在类似于微波,频率为每秒数十亿次的环境中。虽然4G(当前一代)的危害已经够糟糕的了,但5G的出现将会使健康危害程度疯狂地加大。

In order to understand the health risks resulting from the implementation of 5G technology, we need to first examine the foundation of wireless technology. For years, humans, animals and the environment have all been exposed to health risks starting with the first generation of wireless technologies. We were exposed to frequencies akin to microwaves at magnitudes of several billion cycles per second. While 4G (current generation) was bad enough, 5G takes the game to a whole new level of insanity.


 
如用千兆赫来衡量,5G摆脱了自身与4G之间的差距。千兆赫是影响设备传输速度的交流电(AC)或电磁(EM)波的单位。虽然4G的速度可以达到6GHz左右,但5G技术的速度可以达到30至300 GHz范围内的无线电毫米频段。在数据传输中,5G比4G产生的速度快60到120倍。 5G承诺会带来更多的信息频道,更高的速度,更大的数据包、更快的指数反应,以及从一个基站连接大量的通讯设备。它是自动驾驶汽车的必须,但同时也产生一系列潜在的健康风险。

5G opens up the gap between itself and 4G, measured in terms of gigahertz - the unit of alternating current (AC) or electromagnetic (EM) waves that affect the transmission speeds of devices. while 4G tops out at around 6GHz, 5G technology promises radio millimetre bands in the 30 to 300 GHz range. This produces speeds up to 60 to 120 times faster than 4G in data transmissions. 5G promises to bring larger channels, higher speeds, larger packets of data, exponential responsiveness and the ability to connect a host of devices from a single location. It becomes the foundation for self-driving cars while also causing a long list of potential health risks.



世界有两个城市,布鲁塞尔和日内瓦都明白这个问题。他们停止了5G的尝试,并禁止将无线系统升级到5G。另外,瑞士正在推迟5G部署,以建立一个辐射监测的系统。纽约州的锡拉丘兹市也试图建立一些健康保障措施,并“就政府有对5G天线进行安全检查的权利与5G供应商进行谈判”,以减轻公众对辐射的担忧。

Two cities – Brussels and Geneva understand this issue and have blocked trials and banned upgrades of their wireless systems to 5G out of this concern. Switzerland is delaying its 5G rollout in order to create a system to monitor radiation. Syracuse, New York, is also attempting to set up some safeguards and has "negotiated the right to conduct on-demand safety inspections of 5G antennas" to allay public concerns.



值得注意的是,美国联邦通信委员会(FCC)承认他们没有就5G对人体健康的影响进行研究。该委员会或各电讯公司也没有出钱做这项研究。甚至没人打算做此研究。事实是,当5G开通后,它将是有史以来第一次用人类自己来测试自己是否会受到5G的伤害。

It is interesting to note that in the United States the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) admits no 5G safety studies have been conducted or funded by the agency or telecommunications industry, and that none are planned. When 5G launches, it will be the first actual test on human beings ever performed.

调查记者Norm Alster写了一本关于FCC如何被其监管的电讯行业牵着鼻子走的书。书中透露,前FCC主席在进入FCC之前自己就是无线行业游说组织的负责人,这解释了为什么FCC不相信5G的健康风险,并且不会按照行业惯例来减轻这种风险。

Investigative journalist Norm Alster wrote a book on how the FCC is dominated by industries it presumably regulates. In that book, he revealed that the previous FCC Chair was the head of a lobbying group for wireless industry before he joined the FCC thus explaining why the FCC does not believe in studying the 5G health risks and would not wait for the standards to take actions to allay such risks.



该书还展示了电信业如何操纵公众舆论,损害提及5G危险的科学家们的公信度,削减研究经费,发表5G无害的假研究报告,在没有科学家共识的情况下声称5G无害的“科学共识”。当然,电信行业还花费数百万美元游说联邦通信委员会,确保其赚钱的底线。

The book also shows how the telecommunications industry is manipulating public opinion by undermining the credibility of scientists that speak of dangers, cutting funds for research, publishing manipulated studies showing no harm and claiming "scientific consensus" of no harm when no such consensus actually exists. Naturally, the telecommunications industry also spends millions of dollars lobbying the FCC on issues that might impact its bottom line.
 
欧洲议会提出的,欧洲委员会(2011年)关于电磁场潜在危险和电磁场对环境的影响的1815决议均得到了科学家们的认可:

Resolution 1815 of the Council of Europe (2011) on the potential dangers of electromagnetic field and their effect on the environment prepared by its Parliamentary Assembly was endorsed by scientists:



“我们,签名的科学家们,建议聘请那些不受通讯行业控制的科学家们就5G对人类健康和环境的潜在危害进行全面研究之前,暂停5G的推出。 5G将大大增加人被射频电磁场(RF-EMF)的影响,且已被证明这对人类和环境有害。”

“We, the undersigned scientists, recommend a moratorium on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry. 5G will substantially increase exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF)… and has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment.”

目前,近40个国家的180多名科学家和医生正在警告全世界有关5G的健康风险。美国和中国之间正在进行的贸易战中涉及数据传送安全的争执将反对5G的声音淹没了。我们需要考虑采取日常措施来保护自己免受5G传送塔和和基站的射频(RF)辐射。无线行业不仅仅是建立一个更快下载速度的基础设施,它实际上正在构建一个全球性的微波炉。

At this moment, over 180 scientists and doctors in almost 40 countries are warning the world about 5G health risks. These voices are drowned out in the on-going trade war between United States and China over data security concerns. We need to look at taking daily measures to protect ourselves from radio frequency (RF) radiation surrounding us coming off 5G towers and cell stations. The wireless industry is not just building an infrastructure that provides faster downloads, it is practically building a global microwave oven.

下一次,我们可以探索如何保护自己的方法和手段,并最大限度地减少RF辐射的影响。这种辐射必将在不久的未来与5G时代一起到来。

Next time, we can explore ways and means to protect ourselves and minimize the impact of the increased RF radiation that will surely arrive along with the 5G era one day not far into the future.









与本文相关文章

网友评论

网友评论仅供其表达个人看法,并不表明大中资讯网立场。评论不可涉及非法、粗俗、猥亵、歧视,或令人反感的内容,本网站有权删除相关内容。

请先 点击登录注册 后发表评论
You must be logged in to join the discussion

©2013 - 2024 chinesenewsgroup.com Chinese News Group Ltd. 大中资讯网. All rights reserved. 
Distribution, transmission or republication of any material from chinesenewsgroup.com is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Chinese News Group Ltd.